web search restructuring

Yogesh Kumbhar ,Tejas Kute ,Akash Mheter,Tambre K.G,Kumbhar H. R.

Published in International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology

ISSN: 2321-3337          Impact Factor:1.521         Volume:5         Issue:3         Year: 22 March,2015         Pages:384-391

Abstract

For some sort of broad-topic and unclear question, unique people may have unique search goals whenever they post this to a search engine. The actual inference and research associated with individual search goals can be extremely helpful with bettering search results importance and individual encounter. In this document, we propose some sort of novel way of infer individual search goals simply by studying search results question fire wood. Primary, we propose some sort of structure to find out unique individual search goals for just a question simply by clustering your offered comments consultations. Opinions consultations are made out of individual click-through fire wood and will correctly indicate the details wants associated with people. Second, we propose some sort of novel way of generate pseudo-documents to higher represent your comments consultations pertaining to clustering.

Download Journal Download Certificate

Kewords

User search goals, comments consultations, pseudo-documents, restructuring listings, categorized regular perfection.

Reference

[1] R. Baeza-Yates and B. Ribeiro-Neto, Modern Information Retrieval. ACM Press, 1999. 512 IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON KNOWLEDGE AND DATA ENGINEERING, VOL. 25, NO. 3, MARCH 2013 [2] R. Baeza-Yates, C. Hurtado, and M. Mendoza, “Query Recommendation Using Query Logs in Search Engines,” Proc. Int’l Conf. Current Trends in Database Technology (EDBT ’04), pp. 588-596, 2004. [3] D. Beeferman and A. Berger, “Agglomerative Clustering of a Search Engine Query Log,” Proc. Sixth ACM SIGKDD Int’l Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD ’00), pp. 407-416, 2000. [4] S. Beitzel, E. Jensen, A. Chowdhury, and O. Frieder, “Varying Approaches to Topical Web Query Classification,” Proc. 30th Ann. Int’l ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development (SIGIR ’07), pp. 783-784, 2007. [5] H. Cao, D. Jiang, J. Pei, Q. He, Z. Liao, E. Chen, and H. Li, “Context-Aware Query Suggestion by Mining Click-Through,” Proc. 14th ACM SIGKDD Int’l Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD ’08), pp. 875-883, 2008. [6] H. Chen and S. Dumais, “Bringing Order to the Web: Automatically Categorizing Search Results,” Proc. SIGCHI Conf. Human Factors in Computing Systems (SIGCHI ’00), pp. 145-152, 2000. [7] C.-K Huang, L.-F Chien, and Y.-J Oyang, “Relevant Term Suggestion in Interactive Web Search Based on Contextual Information in Query Session Logs,” J. Am. Soc. for Information Science and Technology, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 638-649, 2003. [8] T. Joachims, “Evaluating Retrieval Performance Using Clickthrough Data,” Text Mining, J. Franke, G. Nakhaeizadeh, and I. Renz, eds., pp. 79-96, Physica/Springer Verlag, 2003. [9] T. Joachims, “Optimizing Search Engines Using Clickthrough Data,” Proc. Eighth ACM SIGKDD Int’l Conf. Knowledge Discovery and Data Mining (SIGKDD ’02), pp. 133-142, 2002. [10] T. Joachims, L. Granka, B. Pang, H. Hembrooke, and G. Gay, “Accurately Interpreting Clickthrough Data as Implicit Feedback,” Proc. 28th Ann. Int’l ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ’05), pp. 154-161, 2005. [11] R. Jones and K.L. Klinkner, “Beyond the Session Timeout: Automatic Hierarchical Segmentation of Search Topics in Query Logs,” Proc. 17th ACM Conf. Information and Knowledge Management (CIKM ’08), pp. 699-708, 2008. [12] R. Jones, B. Rey, O. Madani, and W. Greiner, “Generating Query Substitutions,” Proc. 15th Int’l Conf. World Wide Web (WWW ’06), pp. 387-396, 2006. [13] U. Lee, Z. Liu, and J. Cho, “Automatic Identification of User Goals in Web Search,” Proc. 14th Int’l Conf. World Wide Web (WWW ’05), pp. 391-400, 2005. [14] X. Li, Y.-Y Wang, and A. Acero, “Learning Query Intent from Regularized Click Graphs,” Proc. 31st Ann. Int’l ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ’08), pp. 339-346, 2008. [15] M. Pasca and B.-V Durme, “What You Seek Is what You Get: Extraction of Class Attributes from Query Logs,” Proc. 20th Int’l Joint Conf. Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI ’07), pp. 2832-2837, 2007. [16] B. Poblete and B.-Y Ricardo, “Query-Sets: Using Implicit Feedback and Query Patterns to Organize Web Documents,” Proc. 17th Int’l Conf. World Wide Web (WWW ’08), pp. 41-50, 2008. [17] D. Shen, J. Sun, Q. Yang, and Z. Chen, “Building Bridges for Web Query Classification,” Proc. 29th Ann. Int’l ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ’06), pp. 131-138, 2006. [18] X. Wang and C.-X Zhai, “Learn from Web Search Logs to Organize Search Results,” Proc. 30th Ann. Int’l ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ’07),pp. 87-94, 2007. [19] J.-R Wen, J.-Y Nie, and H.-J Zhang, “Clustering User Queries of a Search Engine,” Proc. Tenth Int’l Conf. World Wide Web (WWW ’01), pp. 162-168, 2001. [20] H.-J Zeng, Q.-C He, Z. Chen, W.-Y Ma, and J. Ma, “Learning to Cluster Web Search Results,” Proc. 27th Ann. Int’l ACM SIGIR Conf. Research and Development in Information Retrieval (SIGIR ’04), pp. 210-217, 2004. [21] Hemant Kumbhar, Raj Kulkarni and Suresh Limkar “Legacy to Web 2.0”, FICTA 2013, Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing 247, 517 DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-029313_59, © Springer.