Published in International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Science Engineering and Information Technology
ISSN: 2321-3337 Impact Factor:1.521 Volume:4 Issue:3 Year: 23 May,2015 Pages:401-405
Students’ informal conversations on social media (e.g. Twitter, Facebook) shed light into their educational experiences—opinions, feelings, and concerns about the learning process. Data from such un instrumented environments can provide valuable knowledge to inform student learning. Analyzing such data, however, can be challenging. The complexity of students’ experiences reflected from social media content requires human interpretation. However, the growing scale of data demands automatic data analysis techniques. In this paper, we developed a workflow to integrate both qualitative analysis and large-scale data mining techniques. We focused on engineering students’ Twitter posts to understand issues and problems in their educational experiences. We first conducted a qualitative analysis on samples taken from about 25,000 tweets related to engineering students’ college life. We found engineering students encounter problems such as heavy study load, lack of social engagement, and sleep deprivation. Based on these results, we implemented a multi-label classification algorithm to classify tweets reflecting students’ problems. We then used the algorithm to train a detector of student problems from about 35,000 tweets streamed at the geo-location of Purdue University. This work, for the first time, presents a methodology and results that show how informal social media data can provide insights into students’ experiences
social networks,Education, computers and education, social networking, web text analysis
[1] G. Siemens and P. Long, “Penetrating the fog: Analytics in learning and education,” Educause Review, vol. 46, no. 5, pp. 30–32, 2011. [2] M. Rost, L. Barkhuus, H. Cramer, and B. Brown, “Representation and communication: challenges in interpreting large social media datasets,” in Proceedings of the 2013 conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 2013, pp. 357–362. [3] M. Clark, S. Sheppard, C. Atman, L. Fleming, R. Miller, R. Stevens, R. Streveler, and K. Smith, “Academic pathways study: Processes and realities,” in Proceedings of the American Society for Engineering Education Annual Conference and Exposition 2008. [4] C. J. Atman, S. D. Sheppard, J. Turns, R. S. Adams, L. Fleming, R. Stevens, R. A. Streveler, K. Smith, R. Miller, L. Leifer, K. Yasuhara, and D. Lund, “Enabling engineering student success: The final report for the Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education,” Morgan & Claypool Publishers, Center for the Advancement of Engineering Education, 2010. [5] R. Ferguson, “The state of learning analytics in 2012: A review and future challenges,” Knowledge Media Institute, Technical Report KMI-2012-01, 2012.