isrjournals
User Sign in    Editor Sign in

corporate case governance in secure triple des data changes and multi hand administration

Bhavani.M ,M.C.Babu

Published in International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Networking,Wireless and Mobile Communications

ISSN: 2320-7248          Impact Factor:1.8         Volume:2         Issue:2         Year: 15 April,2015         Pages:149-158

International Journal of Advanced Research in Computer Networking,Wireless and Mobile Communications

Abstract

Corporate case governance plays a key role as a management technology for end – to – end, IP-nized networks and telecommunication networks. Policies are rules governing the choices in behaviour of a system. They are often used as a means of implementing flexible and adaptive systems for management of internet services, distributed systems, and security systems. In this paper the modification or change in a Case based on user administration, the Chief vigilance commissioner, vigilance commissioner, secretary (Home Minister) are the members who are involved in a case. Based on the privilege, those peoples are formed under the group of society. Multiple works is handled in a society. Any modification is done based on users in a administration. Here the First user in this society, changes the case in a file .A private key is generated over the case due to the modification done in a file. After modification, user send an email to another user in the administration and public key is generated. Second user having private key already in a file and he accepts the changes over first user means cases both public and private keys are combined. Finally, modification done in a file.

Kewords

Private key, public key , CBI key and encrypting the data storage

Reference

REFERENCE [1] AHN, G.-J. AND R. SANDHU 1999. The RSL99 Language for Role-based Separation of Duty Constraints. Fourth ACM Workshop on Role-Based Access Control, Fairfax, Virginia, USA, ACM Press. [2] Anderson.J.P., Computer Security Technology Planning Study, tech. report ESD-TR-73-51, Mitre, Oct. 1972. Harrison.M.A., Ruzzo.W.L., and Ullman.J.D, “Protection in Operating Systems,” Comm. ACM, vol. 19, no. 8, 1976, pp. 461–471. [3] ANTÓN, A. I., J. H. DEMPSTER, ET AL. 2000. Deriving Goals from a Use Case Based Requirements Specification for an Electronic Commerce System. Sixth International Workshop on Requirements Engineering: Foundation for Software Quality (REFSQ), Stockholm, Sweden. [4] Badger.L et al., “Practical Domain and Type Enforcement for UNIX,” Proc. IEEE Symp. Security and Privacy, IEEE CS Press, 1995, pp. 66–77. [5] BELL, D. E. AND L. LAPADULA 1973. Secure Computer Systems: Mathematical Foundations and Model. Bedford, MA, MITRE Corporation. [6] Barth.A, Felt.A.P, Saxena.P, and Boodman.A. Protecting Browsers from Extension Vulnerabilities. In Proceedings of the 17th Network and Distributed System Security Symposium (NDSS 2010). [7] BARKER, S. AND A. ROSENTHAL 2001. Flexible Security Policies in SQL. Fifteenth Annual IFIP WG 11.3 Working Conference on Database and Application Security, Niagara on the Lake, Ontario, Canada. [8] Beznosov.K, Inglesant.P, Lobo.J, Reeder.R, and Zurko.M.E. Usability meets access control: challenges and research opportunities. In SACMAT ’09: Proceedings of the 14th ACM symposium on Access control models and technologies, pages 73–74, New York, NY, USA, 2009. ACM. [9] BOSWELL, A. 1995. Specification and Validation of a Security Policy Model. IEEE Transacations on Software Engineering 21(2). [10] Enck.W., Ongtang.M., and McDaniel.P.D., On Lightweight Mobile Phone Application Certification. In E. Al-Shaer, S. Jha, and A. D. Keromytis, editors, ACM Conference on Computer and Communications Security, pages 235–245. ACM, 2009. [11] Kohonen.T., Self Organizing Maps. Springer, third edition, 2001. [17], Lampson.B.W., Protection. SIGOPS Oper. Syst. Rev.,8(1):18–24, 1974. [12] Krstic.I and Gar!nkel.S.L., “Bitfrost: The One Laptop per Child Security Model,” Proc. Symp. Usable Privacy and Security, ACM Press, 2007, pp. 132–142. [13] Li.N., Grosof.B.N., and Feigenbaum.J., “Delegation Logic: A Logic- Based Approach to Distributed Authorization,” ACM Trans. Information and System Security, vol. 6, no.1, 2003, pp. 128–171. [14] Ongtang.M., McLaughlin.S.E, Enck.W., and McDaniel.P.D., Semantically rich application-centric security in android. In ACSAC, pages 340–349. IEEE Computer Society, 2009. [15] Reeder.R.W., Bauer.L., Cranor.L.F., Reiter.M.K., Bacon.K., How.K., and Strong.H., Expandable grids for visualizingand authoring computer security policies. In CHI ’08, pages 1473–1482, New York, NY, USA, 2008. ACM